Critical Thinking in Homeland Security Essay

vituperative persuasion in region of origin earnest entrance native land Security is an requisite ruin of the credentials organs that ar rattling life-and-death in ensuring the protection of the unpolisheds sovereignty. Just as new(prenominal) nations in the world, coupled States faces material brats from the unwrap-of-door and internal com re atomic number 18s. The US established Homeland Security De art objectment in 2003, in an effort to address the external threats and onset resembling the kinfolk 11 terrorist blows (Pruitt, 2003, The 9/11 kick, 2005). on that pointfore, the main objective of the segment is to encumber terrorist combats in the US. Addition wholly last(predicate)y, the part has to hornswoggle down the exposure of the nation to terrorist act and minimizing the injuries that terminations from the attacks, if attacks run. To deliver the nigh(a)s its mandate the incision applies several(prenominal)(prenominal) skills. These ski lls atomic number 18 manoeuvreed at determining the likelihood of a threat and establishing the believability of the threat as per the training provided. Among the skills utilize is the slender intellection. By definition, deprecative cerebration refers to the ability by the department personnel to make clear, keen-sighted judgments (Paul & Elder, 2009). This means that the ratiocinations regarding tribute department should be growd with a intumesce up pattern bug show up solvees (Pruitt, 2003). captious mentation downstairs m whatever other(a)land guarantor focuses on crucial elements of melodic theme and asking the relevant questions. This means that the department has to guess every piece of shew at their dis rig in fix up to develop impound surety solutions to the coarse. The tidings put forward below testament offer at establishing what precise takeing method prototype is appropriate for the finality-making within the structures of fa therland protective covering (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). The primer coat behind this inquiry is super parasitic on the particular that thither atomic number 18 diametric critical cerebration instances. These posers argon very useful in the since they help to find the top hat and powerful solution in country of origin parameter. However, opposite perplexs tin different results.Discussion The kinfolk 11 attack brought about unique remove for good, efficient and hard-hitting guarantor setup. With the introduction of the Homeland Security division, the country was placed at a fleck to deal with the terrorist act threats. The terrorism activities argon currently very dynamic and in re lick there is a acquire for the solutions that might come upon these ch each(prenominal)enges (Pruitt, 2003). As a consequence, the native land gage personnel is subscribe to meet the ever rising guide for increase demand of the hostage work as well as conflux the high p laced accountability standards. To bodily cognitive process these requirements they develop to learn to become exceedingly skilled in their level of thought, as well as reasoning abilities. The central reason for the need to improve skills is that the employees have to analyze all the massive breeding, perceive it, identify the problems and swirl solution (Paul & Elder, 2009). However, the treat of this massive randomness comes against the race of time. Homeland aegis department has to make by the bye decision that would help to acquire each threats that whitethorn a face-lift or authorization the already existing threats (Pruitt, 2003). Additionally, the strategies employed by the terrorist ar changing day in day out, and as well these changes must be encompassed in the decision which the department is undertaking. For instance, before the family 11 attack, the demurrer apparatus restricted themselves to biological and chemical threats. Moreover, the use of a irplane as a tool to carry out terrorism strikes was covered by defense agencies like the Pentagon (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). On the new(prenominal) hand, the threat of airplane strike was non addressed as the security agencies believed this would result to giving the terrorist an additional tool to their disposal. The spokesperson about the use of airplane as a tool of terrorism indicates an futile appearance of using the avail adequate randomness to mitigate the terrorist attacks. In this regard, critical thinking is very essential in manner in which the mother country security handles the nurture they acquire to handle security issues or threats (Paul & Elder, 2009). This is mainly be become critical thinking offers the prognostication and diagnosis abstract for security issues. omen depends chiefly on the ability of the security organs to be able to think ahead. thought process ahead, as part of critical thinking, dictates that the security organs are able to estab lish the belike causes of terrorism and probable outcomes (Kiltz, 2009). Diagnosis means the analysis of antecedent threats which in turn helps to extrapolate the likely succeeding(a) events. In this regard, security organs are able to identify their then(prenominal) failures and in turn making amendments. Additionally, the organs are able to replicate ultimo successes to the future.Best Critical Thinking form firearm understanding the importance of the critical thinking skills, there are several critical thinking mystifys at the disposal of security organs to address whatever country of origin security issues. It is very crucial to put a grass of furiousness on the fact that critical thinking is basic requirement for security decisions facing the country (Paul & Elder, 2009). in that locationfore, to identify the outflank critical thinking regulate it would be circumspect to learn the devil factors that will command a very major persona in determining the best mildew. Critical thinking in the mount of country of origin security is fundamentally dependent on the most important factor for good decision-making and the temper of the fatherland security context (Browne & Keeley, 2007).1. Decision making Critical thinking is fundamentally aimed at arriving at appropriate decision. Every decision make or arrived at should be able to offer solution in the context of country of origin security. In this light, the decision of the security apparatus should be able to potently prevent the threats that arise as well as minimize the damages is events occur (Kiltz, 2009). Thus, critical thinking plays a pivotal intention in decision-making impact. On the same none, the best decision-making gravel is exceedingly reliant on the honest questions. The business question are give tongue to to be the main factor that enable effective decisions to be made in all the fields of the society, security being inclusive (Kiltz, 2009). Questions are a g ood guiding factor musical composition looking for the appropriate results. One, correctly questions take a shit a structure that our thinking relies upon that is to say, slump questions are essential in decision the suitable materials or information that are essential to the decision or solutions. Secondly, reform questions play a vital routine of determining the course of our thinking. In this regard, the right questions are crucial element of individualistic thinking (Kiltz, 2009). This indicates that the right questions part of the country of origin security parameters, in that they would help the decision makers in this context will arrive the best solutions practicable to the respective(a) security challenges.2. The nature of country of origin security The processes and the activities meet decision making in the parameters or the context of the fatherland security are substantially complex. The complexity comes in two levels one, there amount of data or informatio n being processed is exceedingly large and second, there are a lot of dynamics and variables in homeland security decisions (Paul & Elder, 2009). Therefore, the decision-making process has a high requirement of exhaustive scrutiny of all the probable accomp eithering implications of any decision made. In addition, the scrutiny extends other operational options antecedent or before the enforcing any decision passed. A good display case relates to divergence tactics that are super employed by terrorist (Davis, 2012). This is where a threat is identified in a circumstance location date in reality the actual threat is in roughly other place. Without appropriate critical thinking capabilities, the security apparatus are expected to put enough strain on areas which are reported to have the threat while leaving the other places vulnerable. netherstanding the nature of homeland security is pegged on homeland security operations and the past failure. historical failures help to understand what part of the process failed and how efficiently and effectively did homeland rise from their falls. For instance from the example above, if the severity of a homeland security event was increased by the misjudgment stated above, in future homeland security would put all efforts at protecting all places every bit while still putting strain on any information pull together (Paul & Elder, 2009). That fact encompasses a crucial part of the critical thinking in such(prenominal)(prenominal) a security decision-making process.In effect, the most effective critical thinking model should be all-inclusive. Inclusivity means that all the on hand(predicate) alternatives should be interpreted into account while concurrently evaluating the possible outcomes associated with each likely action. The staff applied is similar to a coarse-grained theory model (Davis, 2012). In such a model, the homeland security is conjectural to establish every strategy gettable to them as we ll as those for sale to the opponents, the terrorists. This would help to preempt most if not all, of the threats posed by dissimilar terrorists groups. Therefore, every strategy has probable action, which in turn will deliver results. It would be the aim of homeland to select the most applicable strategy and take an action that would offer the best-expected outcome (Paul & Elder, 2009). For example, through information and intuition gathering, the security organs in the get together States had all the necessary, adequate and relevant information to indicate that an attack was eminent. This information was prior to the September 11 attack, which detailed the Al groundwork plans to attack the US. This shows that the security organs had the available strategies of the opponents. However, the organs failed to select the best strategy and their actions failed to meet the required results (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). The time constraints also play a critical part in undertaking any security decision. The reason behind this is that despite the large volumes of information that need to processed, the uncertainty of when a homeland security event is likely to occur needs by the way decision-making. Using the September 11 example, it can be sight that the security organs failed to meet the by the bye decision requirement (Kiltz, 2009). Although all the information processed indicated the likelihood of a terrorism incident in United States, no timely action was taken to preempt the threats due to the argument that the decision process was at its preliminary stage.Additionally, homeland security should be in a position to predict the opponents likely cause of action and also putting a lot of effort towards preventing the threats preempting the homeland actions. This is attached to diversion tactics, where the threats mature to events in places other than those indicated in the threats information. This was the strategy that was employed by the Al nucleotide to b eat homeland security at their game in September 11 (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). forward to the attack, the information gathered indicated that the threats were highly in United States departments and agencies that were beyond borders. The fact that oversea parts of homeland security were threatened, the homeland skewed its efforts towards the external offices and agencies. Consequently, the Al Qaeda anticipated the moves of homeland security, and they counteracted by attack the internal departments (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). Critical thinking should help to homeland security to close all the available loopholes that may expose their operations, and the country was vast.3. Right Questions feigning As stated earlier, there are several models at the disposal of the homeland security, but among them asking the right questions takes the reign. There are several factors that have firmly tilted the odds towards the right questions model of critical thinking (Browne & Keeley, 2007). First, the model plays a pivotal role in addressing the various loopholes found under the nature of homeland security. For instance the failures that were capitalized by the Al Qaeda in the September 11 attack (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). The right questions model aims at querying all the information available. The intrusive nature of the model allows the various security issues to be determined as well as determining the necessary conclusions. The conclusions are highly dependent on the reasoning, assumptions, and limpidity of words.There are numerous benefits that accompany this essential model of right questions. To begin with the model is highly useful in fling a well detailed analysis of the decision made as well as the cause of actions undertaken. When comparing this model with the other models such as the elements of thought thinking model, right questions model outranks them all in enabling homeland to meet its objectives or targets (Browne & Keeley, 2007). Furthermore, it is established that the model has other models well inbuilt. Mainly, homeland security establishes the coercive elements of the other models and encompasses them in the right questions model. As a consequence, the models offer comprehensive and well-contained solutions out of all the available alternatives. In addition, the said model is highly interactive as it offers an all rounded analysis of the various situations. The analysis is crucial in timely and effective decision-making as well as in actualization of the actions set. Additionally, the model allows homeland to identify the instances of fallacies in reasoning (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). Well thought out decision should not be direct by a belief, myth of misconceptions. This allows homeland security process of verification and establishment of order to be thorough and unbiased. If some essential information is missed, the model would results to different alternatives. Right questions model bases its success on availabi lity of possible alternatives. Therefore, the model puts a lot emphasis on the available information which helps decision makers to arrive at the best possible alternative. On the other hand, the other models have some constraints in their operations (Browne & Keeley, 2007). For instance, the Element of Thought thinking model success is highly dependent on the emphasis given to some four aspects of decision-making.Using the Model some(prenominal) failures have been seen under the dome of homeland security. These failures are highly attributed as the collateral contributors of past events like the September 11 attacks. The right questions model can slowly address these past challenges (Browne & Keeley, 2007). Moreover, the model is the get wind to providing support to the homeland security decision-making process as well as creating and enhancing the credibility of the actions undertaken by homeland security. The right questions model is dependent on an extensive apparitional anal ysis. This analysis is the foundation of critical thinking. As a consequence, the right questions model helps to evaluate all the possible alternatives and their accompanying actions which aim at getting the best possible solution. The model has been extensively used under the homeland security context to wipe out and lessen threats like the September 11 attacks. For example, prior to September 11 attacks the United States intelligence had gathered that there were several threats directed towards the United States institutions outside the country (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). Lack of a wider unearthly analysis, the homeland security failed in its job (Browne & Keeley, 2007). In dependence to the information, the homeland security strengthened the security agencies beyond borders and failed to do so with the domestic agencies. As a consequence, the Al Qaeda used this loophole to carry out the attacks in the US soil (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). Under right questions model, an in-dept h analysis would have taken place triggering homeland security to reinforce all the security agencies crosswise the board. Such analysis would have enabled homeland security to alleviate the September 11 attacks. The alleviation would have been achieved through the fact that the homeland security would have easily identify and eliminated all the security exposures that confront the United states at large without overemphasis on the overseas institutions (Browne & Keeley, 2007). The fallacies of logic resulted to this misguided conclusions. While combating the Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, there was a belief that the US sward was safe from the Al Qaeda actions. This resulted to homeland security ignoring the domestic security need for dealing with terrorism. Additionally, there were not efforts to fill the information gaps that were there before the attacks. There were poor statistics since there were limited activities that were undertaken by security agencies in the United States (The 9/11 Commission, 2005). The model selected put emphasis on identifying the missing information which in turns increases the chances of obtaining the best strategy and the appropriate cause of action to be employed. For instance, the evidence provided that an attack was imminent, but there were no prompt actions that were undertaken to mitigate these threats. Also, despite the availability of evidence that indicated that there were terrorist threats facing the US, no security actions were undertaken in time (Browne & Keeley, 2007). The claims behind the wish of actions were that the decision process was still at preliminary stages, indicating the rigidity of the security operations. The selected model offers flexible and dynamic solutions to challenges. Through the right questions model, appropriate decisions would have been arrive at early enough to mitigate the threats. mop up Critical thinking is crucial for the undertakings of the homeland security department. This is because t here are significant complexities of the decisions and accompanying actions. The critical thinking models are several, but one outranks the others the right questions model is very essential in establishing the right decisions and cause of actions. The model employs a wider spectral analysis strategy with an aim of achieving efficient, effective and timely solutions. Looking at the pertinence of the model against the events of September 11 attacks the model would achieve better-desired results (The 9/11 Commission, 2005).ReferencesBrowne, M., & Keeley, S. (2007). request the right questions. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson scholar Hall.Davis, V. (2012). Use Critical Thinking to master Personal Biases. IN Homeland Security. Retrieved 22 January 2015, from http//inhomelandsecurity.com/use-critical-thinking-to-overcome-personal-biases/Kiltz, L. (2009). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Homeland Security and pinch steering Courses. Journal Of Homeland Security And Emergency Man agement, 6(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http//www.innovative-analytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/DevelopingCriticalThinking.pdfPaul, R., & Elder, L. (2009). The miniature guide to critical thinking. Dillon Beach, Calif. groundwork for Critical Thinking.Pruitt, K. (2003). Modeling Homeland Security A Value Focused Thinking Approach (1st ed., pp. 1-236). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Department of the Air Force, Air University. Retrieved from http//www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/afit/pruitt_vft_hls.pdfThe 9/11 Commission,. (2005). The 9/11 Commission Report Final Report of the subject area Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (1st ed., pp. 1-400). capital letter DC U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http//www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-911REPORT/pdf/GPO-911REPORT.pdf reference document